Reductionism in science and the belief systems of religion are significantly shape the course of Indian agriculture, often fueling polarized narratives that impact policy and farm-level practice. This is happening in a context where farming and food systems are facing significant challenges from natural resource degradation to economic unviability compounded by the risk of climate change. Both scientific reductionism (e.g., genetic determinism, input-focused interventions) and religious/spiritual reductionism (e.g., excessive focus on desi breeds and unexplainable cosmological forces) can oversimplify the complex realities of agroecosystems and rural life.
Reductionism in Science
Reductionism in agricultural science seeks to explain biological phenomena by isolating parts—genes, inputs, or particular practices—ignoring ecological, social, and economic complexity.
Examples include:
- Genetic Determinism & Engineering: Modern wheat and rice breeding have prioritized a handful of high-yield traits, often at the expense of diverse indigenous cultivars and resilience. The Green Revolution’s input-intensive model and the belief that crop performance is predetermined mainly by genes, undervaluing local adaptation and farmer innovation. Now this has further narrowed down through genetic engineering (adding genes from other species) or gene editing (amplifying or silencing genes within a species) technologies which pose significant biosafety problems and also not standing up to the claims as external factors are ignored.
- Soil Fertility & Fertilisers: The push for NPK-based chemical fertilizers is rooted in a reductive view that soil health concerns only macronutrient supply. This ignores the complex roles of organic matter, microbial life, and ecosystem cycles now recognized as central to sustainable productivity.
- Biocontrol/Botanicals: Even when promoting alternatives to chemicals (like Azadirachtin -based biopesticides or pyrethroids or using lab reared biofertilisers or biocontrol agents), some programs view success mechanistically—seeking a ‘silver bullet’ rather than integrating botanicals into more holistic, agroecological systems.
Reductionism in Religious Belief Systems
Religious and cultural belief systems, past and present, are playing a major role in Indian organic and natural farming narratives. In earlier times, when good or bad events could not be explained, they were attributed to gods or demons. This led to trees, animals, soil, hills, planets, and stars being worshipped, while diseases and disasters were seen as demons. Although many of these beliefs faded as explanations were discovered, some still persist today despite rational explanations or analyses being available. Excessive focus can reduce multifaceted practices to rituals or symbolic identities.
- Desi Cow & Desi Seed: The narrative that only desi cows make organic farming possible, or that indigenous seeds are inherently superior in all contexts, overlooks the scientific need for agro-biodiversity and the complex breeding advances made by generations of Indian farmers. Often, programs elevate the cow or seed from a component of agroecological design to an object of veneration, conflating spiritual beliefs with practical agronomy.
- Cosmic Energy, Divine Intervention: Some proponents invoke concepts of unseen cosmic energies or divine will as causal agents for soil fertility or yield, encouraging practices based on faith or fear rather than scientific trial and adaptation. This can create barriers to rational assessment and improvement of traditional practices.
- Fear and Suspicion: The creation of narratives that demonize modern genetics, GMOs, or even organic standards as foreign threats, leveraging fear of the unknown, also simplifies public discourse and stifles experimentation.
Who Shapes These Narratives?
These reductionisms, scientific and religious, are often perpetuated by policymakers, advisors, or influencers who have not lived the daily complexities of farming or rural life and may selectively leverage science or tradition to strengthen their advocacy. This results in programs and decisions that overlook lived experience, local diversity, and practical knowledge—often creating top-down “solutions” that fail to address real-world complexity.
- Many narratives romanticizing the role of desi cows and demonizing buffaloes and crossbreeds or demonizing fertilizers originate from urban or non-farming elites, rather than from the grassroots farming community with hands-on experience.
- Scientists or technocrats promoting genetic engineering as a panacea may miss farmer concerns about complexity, risk, and market realities.
Foundation in Spiritual and Religious Traditions
- Many Indian organic and natural farming movements, such as Zero Budget Natural Farming and Rishi-Krishi, explicitly root their approaches in Vedic philosophy, cosmic energy, and reverence for nature—viewing farming as a sacred duty and part of a harmonious relationship with the land.
- Programs like Yogic Farming, promoted by organizations such as Brahma Kumaris, integrate meditation and positive intentions (“metaphysical energy”) into farm work, and some studies suggest perceived benefits like improved crop vigor, quality, and farmer well-being.
Ritual, Practice, and Cosmic Influence
- Many spiritual farming methods emphasize rituals such as applying “Amrit Pani” (nectar water), using sacred soil or holy ash, and following cosmic or planetary calendars for farm operations, reflecting the belief that spiritual and cosmic forces directly affect plant growth and ecosystem health.
- There is often a focus on specific sacred animals or plants, such as reverence for desi cows (believed to have positive energetic properties) and the incorporation of their dung and urine in organic fertilizers.
Social and Psychological Impacts
- Spiritual approaches can create a sense of community resilience, emotional well-being, and deeper motivation among farmers, especially in resistance to the alienation caused by industrial agriculture.
- Such beliefs often inspire a strong commitment to avoiding chemicals, preserving traditional varieties, and practicing nonviolence toward all living beings, aligning closely with the ethics of sustainability and “bread-labor” articulated by figures like Mahatma Gandhi.
Critiques and Challenges
- While spiritual motivations often successfully mobilize farmers for ecological farming, they can sometimes lead to uncritical acceptance of practices without scientific validation, and risk ignoring site-specific agronomic realities if taken to the extreme.
- The blending of spiritualism with organic farming raises debates about whether these systems are best justified by agronomic outcomes or metaphysical philosophy, affecting their scientific credibility and policy recognition.
- While tradition evokes fond memories for some and motivates them to promote age-old practices, a significant part of the population has suffered under tradition, especially those oppressed by caste systems and denied access to resources. These individuals, who have struggled to break free from such chains, do not associate tradition with the same warmth as current narrators do. If historical practices have genuine value and relevance today, they should be thoughtfully reinterpreted and rearticulated
- With changing times, expecting people to follow traditional practices exactly as they were done centuries ago is harmful. Many of these practices involve physical hardship and economic costs, so modernization is necessary to adapt them to current realities
Reductionist Approaches in Policy
Green Revolution Policies: Policies promoting high-yielding varieties, chemical fertilizers, and pesticides were based on simplifying the challenges of farming to matters of genetics and chemistry. This increased food production but resulted in monocultures, soil degradation, groundwater over-extraction, and loss of biodiversity.
Input Subsidy Schemes: Persistent subsidies for fertilizers and irrigation encourage overuse and overlook the broader health of agroecosystems, often at the cost of soil health and long-term sustainability.
Support for Monocropping: Policies like Minimum Support Price (MSP) for specific crops unintentionally encourage monocropping, leading to resilience loss against pests and climate change, and exacerbating groundwater depletion.
Policy Gaps and Consequences
Neglect of Holistic Approaches: Emphasis on single-solution interventions has led to ignoring integrated pest and nutrient management, agroecology, and the social realities faced by farmers such as land fragmentation and gender roles.
Environmental and Social Impact: Reductionist policies have increased farmers’ dependencies on market-bought seeds and inputs and diminished traditional ecological practices and biodiversity, affecting rural livelihoods and women’s roles in farming.
Agroecological Transitions
Indian agriculture is shaped by overlapping forms of reductionism from both science and tradition, affecting policies on seeds, soil, livestock, and pest management. Recognizing and challenging these tendencies—by honoring grounded experience, critical inquiry, and systems thinking—is essential for resilient agroecology and truly sustainable food systems.
Reductionism has strongly influenced Indian agricultural policies, often leading to narrow, input-driven and productivity-focused strategies while neglecting complex ecological and socio-economic factors.
There is now growing recognition of these shortcomings, and recent reforms and discussions call for a paradigm shift towards holistic, context-specific, and sustainable approaches—integrating ecology, farmer knowledge, and socio-economic realities into agricultural policy.
By moving away from reductionist thinking, Indian agricultural policy must aspire to become more adaptive and resilient to the complex challenges of the 21st century and design a new food system and prepare farmers, students and organizations to deal with them.
Recent Comments